1 |
♠K652
♥J76
♦Q94
♣975
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠JT843
♥Q532
♦-
♣AT83
|
♠Q9
♥84
♦T7652
♣KQ62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2/3♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N S 3 ♣3 9-Myres-Bujanovich vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
400 3.50 0.50 3N N 3 ♣2 6-Woods-Scholl vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 ♣A 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ S -1 ♥2 8-Cockerill-Matthews vs 4-McCandless-Olson
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -2 ♠J 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 11-Rook-Brackett
|
2 |
♠J4
♥763
♦AT74
♣AKT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A98765
♥AKJ5
♦K2
♣Q
|
♠-
♥Q842
♦J863
♣J8754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♠* W -2 ♣A 8-Cockerill-Matthews vs 4-McCandless-Olson
120 3.00 1.00 2N S 2 ♥A 6-Woods-Scholl vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
50 1.50 2.50 1♠ W -1 ♣A 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 11-Rook-Brackett
50 1.50 2.50 1♠ W -1 ♣A 9-Myres-Bujanovich vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
80 0.00 4.00 1♠ W 1 ♣A 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
|
3 |
♠53
♥AT6
♦AT8765
♣Q7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K96
♥KJ53
♦KQJ4
♣T5
|
♠QT
♥Q9742
♦93
♣J432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 ♦K 6-Woods-Scholl vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 ♣T 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 11-Rook-Brackett
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 4 ♥K 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ S 5 ♦K 9-Myres-Bujanovich vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
90 0.00 4.00 2♦ N 2 ♥4 8-Cockerill-Matthews vs 4-McCandless-Olson
|
4 |
♠AT2
♥984
♦KQT
♣T984
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K9754
♥JT63
♦A63
♣6
|
♠QJ86
♥AK75
♦J82
♣32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 ♣T 6-Woods-Scholl vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♣T 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 ♣A 11-Rook-Brackett vs 4-McCandless-Olson
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ E 4 ♣A 7-Davis-Ainbinder vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
200 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -1 ♠2 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 2-Smith-Kittock
|
5 |
♠QT
♥A965
♦AQ86
♣J52
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J4
♥KJ743
♦T42
♣A73
|
♠K75
♥T2
♦J975
♣K984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 4 ♦2 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 4 ♣A 11-Rook-Brackett vs 4-McCandless-Olson
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ S 3 ♥4 6-Woods-Scholl vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ S 3 ♦4 7-Davis-Ainbinder vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♦2 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 2-Smith-Kittock
|
6 |
♠AQ943
♥JT
♦KJT
♣K42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T82
♥Q984
♦862
♣853
|
♠65
♥AK7632
♦A5
♣QJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 ♥K 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 2-Smith-Kittock
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ N 5 ♥A 6-Woods-Scholl vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 5 ♥A 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 5 ♥A 7-Davis-Ainbinder vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ N 4 ♥A 11-Rook-Brackett vs 4-McCandless-Olson
|
7 |
♠KJ85
♥J3
♦A76
♣A973
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q94
♥A952
♦KQ83
♣T6
|
♠AT63
♥K86
♦T42
♣KQ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 2/3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣3 2-Smith-Kittock vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣J 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 ♣A 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
140 1.00 3.00 1♥ W 3 ♥J 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 6-Woods-Scholl
300 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -3 ♣T 7-Davis-Ainbinder vs 4-McCandless-Olson
|
8 |
♠93
♥K82
♦T98432
♣62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ42
♥AJT6543
♦65
♣-
|
♠Q
♥97
♦AQ7
♣AKJ9843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 ♠4/5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 6♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ W 5 ♠9 2-Smith-Kittock vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ W 5 ♠9 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ W 5 ♠9 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
480 0.50 3.50 5♥ W 6 ♠9 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 6-Woods-Scholl
480 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 6 ♣6 7-Davis-Ainbinder vs 4-McCandless-Olson
|
9 |
♠83
♥AJT87
♦Q53
♣632
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J9654
♥Q96
♦42
♣JT9
|
♠T72
♥K32
♦KJ986
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 3/2♦ 5/4♥ 2/1♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 ♣A 2-Smith-Kittock vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
180 3.00 1.00 2N S 4 ♦4 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
150 1.00 3.00 2N S 3 ♠5 7-Davis-Ainbinder vs 4-McCandless-Olson
150 1.00 3.00 2N S 3 ♠5 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
150 1.00 3.00 2N S 3 ♣J 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 6-Woods-Scholl
|
10 |
♠A9653
♥7632
♦Q764
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ7
♥T98
♦J9
♣QT875
|
♠84
♥J4
♦AT82
♣K6432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♥T 2-Smith-Kittock vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♦J 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
120 2.00 2.00 2N S 2 ♥T 11-Rook-Brackett vs 6-Woods-Scholl
100 1.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♣7 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♣7 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 4-McCandless-Olson
|
11 |
♠KJT4
♥JT98654
♦2
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠98
♥AQ2
♦KQJ6
♣KQ54
|
♠753
♥K7
♦AT97
♣JT86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ S -2 ♦K 2-Smith-Kittock vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
400 3.00 1.00 3N W 3 ♥J 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 ♥J 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 ♥8 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 4-McCandless-Olson
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 ♥6 11-Rook-Brackett vs 6-Woods-Scholl
|
12 |
♠Q874
♥J73
♦Q32
♣AQ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT9652
♥QT6
♦T
♣854
|
♠K3
♥K95
♦K9864
♣KJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♥7/6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♥J 2-Smith-Kittock vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♦2 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 ♠4 11-Rook-Brackett vs 6-Woods-Scholl
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ W 3 ♣A 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 4-McCandless-Olson
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 3 ♥7 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
|
13 |
♠K
♥KQ75
♦A642
♣K986
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠97642
♥AJ3
♦K3
♣732
|
♠QT53
♥42
♦T975
♣QJ5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 ♠7 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 ♠4 4-McCandless-Olson vs 2-Smith-Kittock
620 2.00 2.00 11-Rook-Brackett vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠4 9-Myres-Bujanovich vs 6-Woods-Scholl
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♠9 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
|
14 |
♠J
♥853
♦K9742
♣K765
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠Q76
♥AJ7
♦J86
♣AQ32
|
♠AT982
♥QT962
♦A
♣98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1/2♣ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦4 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 ♦3 9-Myres-Bujanovich vs 6-Woods-Scholl
420 2.50 1.50 11-Rook-Brackett vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 5 ♦3 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 5 ♣J 4-McCandless-Olson vs 2-Smith-Kittock
|
15 |
♠QJ94
♥A7
♦762
♣A985
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KT72
♥Q963
♦K53
♣64
|
♠A5
♥KJ542
♦QJT
♣KQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E 4 ♣J 4-McCandless-Olson vs 2-Smith-Kittock
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 4 ♦4 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 4 ♣J 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
170 2.00 2.00 11-Rook-Brackett vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 ♣J 9-Myres-Bujanovich vs 6-Woods-Scholl
|
16 |
♠AKJ97
♥T54
♦AJ
♣532
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T865
♥AQ98
♦KT
♣A97
|
♠Q42
♥KJ6
♦832
♣QT64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠3 8-Cockerill-Matthews vs 11-Rook-Brackett
100 3.50 0.50 2♣ W -1 ♠A 2-Smith-Kittock vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
50 2.00 2.00 1♠ N -1 ♣Q 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
90 1.00 3.00 1N E 1 ♠3 4-McCandless-Olson vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
100 0.00 4.00 1♠ N -2 ♣4 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 6-Woods-Scholl
|
17 |
♠AKT
♥Q97654
♦T6
♣92
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠8543
♥T8
♦QJ72
♣T76
|
♠-
♥KJ
♦AK543
♣AKQ543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♦0 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♠3 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
170 2.50 1.50 4♦ E 6 ♥A 2-Smith-Kittock vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
170 2.50 1.50 4♣ E 6 ♥A 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 6-Woods-Scholl
420 0.50 3.50 5♣ E 6 ♥A 4-McCandless-Olson vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
420 0.50 3.50 5♣ E 6 ♥A 8-Cockerill-Matthews vs 11-Rook-Brackett
|
18 |
♠J84
♥Q632
♦KJ
♣A642
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q9532
♥A5
♦86
♣QJ85
|
♠6
♥JT984
♦QT9754
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♠3 8-Cockerill-Matthews vs 11-Rook-Brackett
600 2.00 2.00 3N S 3 ♠3 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 6-Woods-Scholl
600 2.00 2.00 3N S 3 ♣5 2-Smith-Kittock vs 10-Wilson-Wilson
600 2.00 2.00 3N S 3 ♣5 4-McCandless-Olson vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♦8 1-Hedberg-Conley vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
|
19 |
♠Q873
♥Q53
♦52
♣QJ83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ2
♥K74
♦K763
♣T65
|
♠A5
♥T9862
♦AJ9
♣942
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♦* S 1 ♣3 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 ♥T 2-Smith-Kittock vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 ♥T 6-Woods-Scholl vs 4-McCandless-Olson
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 ♥T 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -1 ♥T 11-Rook-Brackett vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
|
20 |
♠Q
♥J97
♦KT764
♣QT75
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠A874
♥QT5
♦QJ9
♣J63
|
♠KJT96
♥K2
♦A53
♣A98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1/2♣ -/1♦ 4♠ 4NT ♦6/7 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥6 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 ♠3 2-Smith-Kittock vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 4 ♦8 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 4 ♦8 6-Woods-Scholl vs 4-McCandless-Olson
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 4 ♦8 11-Rook-Brackett vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
|
21 |
♠T94
♥J65
♦J85
♣QJT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK6
♥K42
♦72
♣AK875
|
♠52
♥97
♦AKT943
♣942
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣Q 6-Woods-Scholl vs 4-McCandless-Olson
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♦7 2-Smith-Kittock vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ E 4 ♣3 11-Rook-Brackett vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -2 ♣A 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 7-Davis-Ainbinder
430 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 ♣6 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
|
22 |
♠982
♥J3
♦KT94
♣QJT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ4
♥K9752
♦A2
♣K92
|
♠Q3
♥QT4
♦Q86
♣A8543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣Q 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 3 ♠8 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-McCandless-Olson
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 3 ♣Q 6-Woods-Scholl vs 2-Smith-Kittock
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 ♣T 11-Rook-Brackett vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 4 ♣Q 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
|
23 |
♠32
♥T8632
♦Q9
♣AKJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K4
♥J754
♦87543
♣Q3
|
♠AQJT86
♥Q9
♦AJ
♣752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ N 4 ♠A 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
90 3.00 1.00 1N W 1 ♥3 6-Woods-Scholl vs 2-Smith-Kittock
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♠A 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♣7 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-McCandless-Olson
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 ♥A 11-Rook-Brackett vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
|
24 |
♠K8
♥J876
♦AT43
♣Q92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠T642
♥T3
♦J76
♣JT63
|
♠AJ5
♥AKQ5
♦52
♣K874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5/6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N E -3 ♠3 6-Woods-Scholl vs 2-Smith-Kittock
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♦8 3-Johnson-Bellinger vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
50 1.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♦K 11-Rook-Brackett vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
50 1.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♦8 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 8-Cockerill-Matthews
90 0.00 4.00 1♣ E 2 ♦K 10-Wilson-Wilson vs 4-McCandless-Olson
|
25 |
♠K43
♥JT3
♦965
♣KQ54
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J86
♥K64
♦K843
♣987
|
♠QT72
♥95
♦AT72
♣AJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 ♣9 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 ♣9 8-Cockerill-Matthews vs 6-Woods-Scholl
90 2.00 2.00 1N N 1 ♣6 2-Smith-Kittock vs 11-Rook-Brackett
50 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 ♦3 7-Davis-Ainbinder vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
50 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 ♣9 4-McCandless-Olson vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
|
26 |
♠J642
♥T92
♦A75
♣K95
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKT3
♥A84
♦862
♣876
|
♠85
♥KJ653
♦KQ
♣J432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -2 ♦5 4-McCandless-Olson vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♦9 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 2-Smith-Kittock vs 11-Rook-Brackett
PASS 1.50 2.50 Pass Out 8-Cockerill-Matthews vs 6-Woods-Scholl
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 3 ♦J 7-Davis-Ainbinder vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
|
27 |
♠K42
♥J9842
♦76
♣964
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠JT95
♥K76
♦QT
♣AK83
|
♠A76
♥T
♦AK8542
♣T72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ E 4 ♣Q 4-McCandless-Olson vs 1-Hedberg-Conley
130 2.50 1.50 2♦ E 4 ♥A 7-Davis-Ainbinder vs 3-Johnson-Bellinger
130 2.50 1.50 2♦ E 4 ♥3 8-Cockerill-Matthews vs 6-Woods-Scholl
130 2.50 1.50 2♦ E 4 ♣Q 2-Smith-Kittock vs 11-Rook-Brackett
500 0.00 4.00 3♥* N -3 ♦A 12-Vickrey-Miller vs 9-Myres-Bujanovich
|